bases in response to an emerging threat in some distant location. Those efforts have failed either because existing technology was unable to produce the desired combat power and protection at a substantially lower weight, or because the cost of combining those historically countervailing features would have been too great.The need for a lighter armored vehicle has grown as the Army’s primary focus has swung sharply from the Cold War requirement for forward-based heavy forces prepared to counter a Soviet assault into Western Europe to being able to rapidly deploy combat power from U.S. AUSA Volunteer Family of the Year AwardĪlthough the M1A2 Abrams remains one of the world’s premier main battle tanks, the Army has tried to develop a replacement that could provide the same or greater lethality and crew survivability with a much lower weight to make it easier to get to the fight and to be more mobile on the battlefield.Letters to Congress & the Administration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |